Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Ask HN: Which harness do you use with Qwen3.8 27B? And why?
2 points by grigio 6 hours ago | hide | past | favorite | 7 comments
I tried several but for me the biggest difference is the browser integration tool/skill. Because without that any model is quite limited to debug the code at runtime
 help



I've been mostly drawn to pi simply because I can modify it so easily to have extensions or behavior I want.

pi.dev with

"packages": [ "npm:context-mode", "npm:pi-subagents", "npm:pi-web-access", "npm:pi-bar", "npm:pi-opencode-bridge", "npm:@ssweens/pi-leash", "npm:pi-caveman", "npm:@ff-labs/pi-fff", "npm:pi-ui-hephaestus", "npm:@alexanderfortin/pi-zai-usage", "npm:pi-cache-optimizer", "npm:@hypabolic/pi-hypa" ]


which extension plugin do you use to debug/automate the web browser?

you shall use CC, serve it via ollama, you need to patch it as CC's timestamp ruins prefill cache.

You need a harness? Does llama include one?

llama.cpp has a web ui nowdays, but with an harness is easier to interact with existing cli tools

opencode, pretty good setup out of the box, no need to go through and find packages for the basics like pi

there are MCP/skills for browser integration that work in any harness




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: